I’ve been called into more “Jira cleanup” projects than I can count. The pattern is usually the same: a team starts strong, uses the out-of-the-box templates, tries to move fast—and six months later, they’re completely stuck. Reporting doesn’t work. Teams are siloed. Everyone’s confused. And now it’s my job to help untangle it all.
Here are the most common Jira setup mistakes I see when companies go it alone—and how to avoid them before they turn into roadblocks.
Jira’s default company-managed project templates feel like a quick win, but could be a trap if it is not planned in a scalable way. Every time you spin up a new project this way, Jira creates new custom fields, issue types, and workflows. Multiply that across teams, and suddenly your instance becomes unmanageable.
I’ve walked into client environments with dozens of nearly identical workflows that don’t talk to each other—and nobody knows which ones are still in use.
It’s like planting a tree every time you open a new project—and wondering why you ended up with a forest you can’t walk through.
Team-managed projects are great for small, isolated teams—but terrible for growing organizations. You get only one board. You can’t share configurations. And cross-team reporting becomes a nightmare.
Most clients don’t realize this until they’ve already built a dozen team-managed projects and hit a wall.
That one checkbox—Company-managed vs. Team-managed—it decides whether you’re building for scale or just buying yourself a future migration.
Out-of-the-box Jira doesn’t know how your teams work. If you don’t customize the instance around your actual processes, people start creating workarounds: spreadsheets, Slack messages, side meetings—anything to avoid using the tool.
At that point, Jira becomes a tax, not a solution.
We fix this by starting with a discovery session. I ask: What are your teams actually trying to do? Who are the end customers for your teams? What are the external team dependencies in your team’s flow? Then we build the system to support that and that is aligned with the top frameworks for agility and scalability (eg. Scale Agile Framework and ITIL).
Buying Jira (or Azure DevOps) doesn’t make you instantly agile the moment you paid the license. It gives you the option for agility and scalability but first you need to have your teams and practices aligned.
You need structure. Roles. Planning discipline. Good habits. If those aren’t in place, Jira will only reflect the chaos—not solve it.
The tool should fit your process—not force you to invent one on the fly.
That’s why we include coaching and enablement in every implementation. The tool works when the people using it are aligned.
Jira should be an enabler and accelerator—not a barrier. If it’s feeling like a burden, or you’re just starting out and want to avoid months of rework, let’s talk.
Book an advisory call with an expert at TecVeris. In just one hour, we’ll look at your setup, flag the risks, and show you what needs to change—before things get messy.
I’ve been called into more “Jira cleanup” projects than I can count. The pattern is usually the same: a team starts strong, uses the out-of-the-box templates, tries to move fast—and six months later, they’re completely stuck. Reporting doesn’t work. Teams are siloed. Everyone’s confused. And now it’s my job to help untangle it all.
Here are the most common Jira setup mistakes I see when companies go it alone—and how to avoid them before they turn into roadblocks.
Jira’s default company-managed project templates feel like a quick win, but could be a trap if it is not planned in a scalable way. Every time you spin up a new project this way, Jira creates new custom fields, issue types, and workflows. Multiply that across teams, and suddenly your instance becomes unmanageable.
I’ve walked into client environments with dozens of nearly identical workflows that don’t talk to each other—and nobody knows which ones are still in use.
It’s like planting a tree every time you open a new project—and wondering why you ended up with a forest you can’t walk through.
Team-managed projects are great for small, isolated teams—but terrible for growing organizations. You get only one board. You can’t share configurations. And cross-team reporting becomes a nightmare.
Most clients don’t realize this until they’ve already built a dozen team-managed projects and hit a wall.
That one checkbox—Company-managed vs. Team-managed—it decides whether you’re building for scale or just buying yourself a future migration.
Out-of-the-box Jira doesn’t know how your teams work. If you don’t customize the instance around your actual processes, people start creating workarounds: spreadsheets, Slack messages, side meetings—anything to avoid using the tool.
At that point, Jira becomes a tax, not a solution.
We fix this by starting with a discovery session. I ask: What are your teams actually trying to do? Who are the end customers for your teams? What are the external team dependencies in your team’s flow? Then we build the system to support that and that is aligned with the top frameworks for agility and scalability (eg. Scale Agile Framework and ITIL).
Buying Jira (or Azure DevOps) doesn’t make you instantly agile the moment you paid the license. It gives you the option for agility and scalability but first you need to have your teams and practices aligned.
You need structure. Roles. Planning discipline. Good habits. If those aren’t in place, Jira will only reflect the chaos—not solve it.
The tool should fit your process—not force you to invent one on the fly.
That’s why we include coaching and enablement in every implementation. The tool works when the people using it are aligned.
Jira should be an enabler and accelerator—not a barrier. If it’s feeling like a burden, or you’re just starting out and want to avoid months of rework, let’s talk.
Book an advisory call with an expert at TecVeris. In just one hour, we’ll look at your setup, flag the risks, and show you what needs to change—before things get messy.
I’ve been called into more “Jira cleanup” projects than I can count. The pattern is usually the same: a team starts strong, uses the out-of-the-box templates, tries to move fast—and six months later, they’re completely stuck. Reporting doesn’t work. Teams are siloed. Everyone’s confused. And now it’s my job to help untangle it all.
Here are the most common Jira setup mistakes I see when companies go it alone—and how to avoid them before they turn into roadblocks.
Jira’s default company-managed project templates feel like a quick win, but could be a trap if it is not planned in a scalable way. Every time you spin up a new project this way, Jira creates new custom fields, issue types, and workflows. Multiply that across teams, and suddenly your instance becomes unmanageable.
I’ve walked into client environments with dozens of nearly identical workflows that don’t talk to each other—and nobody knows which ones are still in use.
It’s like planting a tree every time you open a new project—and wondering why you ended up with a forest you can’t walk through.
Team-managed projects are great for small, isolated teams—but terrible for growing organizations. You get only one board. You can’t share configurations. And cross-team reporting becomes a nightmare.
Most clients don’t realize this until they’ve already built a dozen team-managed projects and hit a wall.
That one checkbox—Company-managed vs. Team-managed—it decides whether you’re building for scale or just buying yourself a future migration.
Out-of-the-box Jira doesn’t know how your teams work. If you don’t customize the instance around your actual processes, people start creating workarounds: spreadsheets, Slack messages, side meetings—anything to avoid using the tool.
At that point, Jira becomes a tax, not a solution.
We fix this by starting with a discovery session. I ask: What are your teams actually trying to do? Who are the end customers for your teams? What are the external team dependencies in your team’s flow? Then we build the system to support that and that is aligned with the top frameworks for agility and scalability (eg. Scale Agile Framework and ITIL).
Buying Jira (or Azure DevOps) doesn’t make you instantly agile the moment you paid the license. It gives you the option for agility and scalability but first you need to have your teams and practices aligned.
You need structure. Roles. Planning discipline. Good habits. If those aren’t in place, Jira will only reflect the chaos—not solve it.
The tool should fit your process—not force you to invent one on the fly.
That’s why we include coaching and enablement in every implementation. The tool works when the people using it are aligned.
Jira should be an enabler and accelerator—not a barrier. If it’s feeling like a burden, or you’re just starting out and want to avoid months of rework, let’s talk.
Book an advisory call with an expert at TecVeris. In just one hour, we’ll look at your setup, flag the risks, and show you what needs to change—before things get messy.
I’ve been called into more “Jira cleanup” projects than I can count. The pattern is usually the same: a team starts strong, uses the out-of-the-box templates, tries to move fast—and six months later, they’re completely stuck. Reporting doesn’t work. Teams are siloed. Everyone’s confused. And now it’s my job to help untangle it all.
Here are the most common Jira setup mistakes I see when companies go it alone—and how to avoid them before they turn into roadblocks.
Jira’s default company-managed project templates feel like a quick win, but could be a trap if it is not planned in a scalable way. Every time you spin up a new project this way, Jira creates new custom fields, issue types, and workflows. Multiply that across teams, and suddenly your instance becomes unmanageable.
I’ve walked into client environments with dozens of nearly identical workflows that don’t talk to each other—and nobody knows which ones are still in use.
It’s like planting a tree every time you open a new project—and wondering why you ended up with a forest you can’t walk through.
Team-managed projects are great for small, isolated teams—but terrible for growing organizations. You get only one board. You can’t share configurations. And cross-team reporting becomes a nightmare.
Most clients don’t realize this until they’ve already built a dozen team-managed projects and hit a wall.
That one checkbox—Company-managed vs. Team-managed—it decides whether you’re building for scale or just buying yourself a future migration.
Out-of-the-box Jira doesn’t know how your teams work. If you don’t customize the instance around your actual processes, people start creating workarounds: spreadsheets, Slack messages, side meetings—anything to avoid using the tool.
At that point, Jira becomes a tax, not a solution.
We fix this by starting with a discovery session. I ask: What are your teams actually trying to do? Who are the end customers for your teams? What are the external team dependencies in your team’s flow? Then we build the system to support that and that is aligned with the top frameworks for agility and scalability (eg. Scale Agile Framework and ITIL).
Buying Jira (or Azure DevOps) doesn’t make you instantly agile the moment you paid the license. It gives you the option for agility and scalability but first you need to have your teams and practices aligned.
You need structure. Roles. Planning discipline. Good habits. If those aren’t in place, Jira will only reflect the chaos—not solve it.
The tool should fit your process—not force you to invent one on the fly.
That’s why we include coaching and enablement in every implementation. The tool works when the people using it are aligned.
Jira should be an enabler and accelerator—not a barrier. If it’s feeling like a burden, or you’re just starting out and want to avoid months of rework, let’s talk.
Book an advisory call with an expert at TecVeris. In just one hour, we’ll look at your setup, flag the risks, and show you what needs to change—before things get messy.
.png)
